Comments on: Commedia dell (stand)arte http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96 IT management in a changing IT world Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:10:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: William Vambenepe — Missing out on the OCCI fun http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-96726 William Vambenepe — Missing out on the OCCI fun Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:31:30 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-96726 [...] is also interesting from a human and organizational perspective. Another take on the good old Commedia dell standarte. Again, I don’t have enough context in the history of this specific group to have an opinion [...] [...] is also interesting from a human and organizational perspective. Another take on the good old Commedia dell standarte. Again, I don’t have enough context in the history of this specific group to have an opinion [...]

]]> By: William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » Unintentional comedy http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-34717 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » Unintentional comedy Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:05:25 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-34717 [...] butt of the joke when the joke is right on. Plus, I made a similar analogy in the past: Commedia dell (stand)arte (once there, make sure you also follow the link to Umit’s [...] [...] butt of the joke when the joke is right on. Plus, I made a similar analogy in the past: Commedia dell (stand)arte (once there, make sure you also follow the link to Umit’s [...]

]]> By: LongHairSteve http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-20 LongHairSteve Sat, 09 Dec 2006 10:55:19 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-20 We need those standards yesterday! Why? Because, once standardized, then we are all on the same page; and then we can forget about the names and how, cause it just works for all. Bar Foo or not. So, names are really only important to distinguish ownership of one of several methods. Power people can be shortsighted with greed of ownership, i.e. value or money only in their pocket. But the whole concept of standardization is to cooporate together for an even greater benefit to all. Cool story, William. I, for one, appreciate all your experiences about creating workable standards. Thanks. We need those standards yesterday! Why? Because, once standardized, then we are all on the same page; and then we can forget about the names and how, cause it just works for all. Bar Foo or not. So, names are really only important to distinguish ownership of one of several methods. Power people can be shortsighted with greed of ownership, i.e. value or money only in their pocket. But the whole concept of standardization is to cooporate together for an even greater benefit to all.

Cool story, William. I, for one, appreciate all your experiences about creating workable standards. Thanks.

]]> By: umit http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-19 umit Fri, 08 Dec 2006 23:46:10 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-19 A Good one, William! Perhaps there is an indirect correlation between the value of the thingy that you try to name and the time spent to name it in a standards body. A Good one, William! Perhaps there is an indirect correlation between the value of the thingy that you try to name and the time spent to name it in a standards body.

]]> By: Tom Maguire http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-18 Tom Maguire Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:57:55 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/96#comment-18 What's in a name? Very funny, LOL....... What’s in a name? Very funny, LOL…….

]]>