<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So long Oslo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/910/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/910</link>
	<description>William Vambenepe&#039;s stage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilip Krishnan</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/910#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilip Krishnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 01:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=910#comment-605</guid>
		<description>William,

Can you explain why you say &quot;but it’s now too far removed from my focus area for me to justify paying much attention&quot;. 

Im not a Microsoft employee/spokesperson :-) but, I&#039;ve always thought of Oslo as the piece of the pie that can be used to model systems/domains/services etc. The &quot;model-aware&quot; inftrastructure/service runtimes that make sense of these models have always been and will continue to remain the application of the oslo technologies in its current state. Atleast thats my interpretation of the roadmap.

What doesnt make sense to me by your post is why the synergy between the modelling technologies and its persistence affects the grand IT vision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William,</p>
<p>Can you explain why you say &#8220;but it’s now too far removed from my focus area for me to justify paying much attention&#8221;. </p>
<p>Im not a Microsoft employee/spokesperson <img src='http://stage.vambenepe.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  but, I&#8217;ve always thought of Oslo as the piece of the pie that can be used to model systems/domains/services etc. The &#8220;model-aware&#8221; inftrastructure/service runtimes that make sense of these models have always been and will continue to remain the application of the oslo technologies in its current state. Atleast thats my interpretation of the roadmap.</p>
<p>What doesnt make sense to me by your post is why the synergy between the modelling technologies and its persistence affects the grand IT vision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Oslo&#8221; and DSI/Dynamic IT at Douglas Purdy</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/910#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Oslo&#8221; and DSI/Dynamic IT at Douglas Purdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=910#comment-604</guid>
		<description>[...] was just reading William Vambenepe’s So long Oslo post and thought I would comment [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was just reading William Vambenepe’s So long Oslo post and thought I would comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Over Process &#187; Links for August 27th</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/910#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>People Over Process &#187; Links for August 27th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=910#comment-603</guid>
		<description>[...] So long Oslo&quot;In the meantime, this brings back the question of what&#8217;s the current modeling story in the System Center team. SDM? SML? Some M-based replacement? Back to CIM? I am just asking because they had been a lot more public and proactive on this than other management vendors, but this has stopped abruptly.&quot; [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So long Oslo&quot;In the meantime, this brings back the question of what&rsquo;s the current modeling story in the System Center team. SDM? SML? Some M-based replacement? Back to CIM? I am just asking because they had been a lot more public and proactive on this than other management vendors, but this has stopped abruptly.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

