<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: /me thinks Google Wave looks like IRC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/794/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/794</link>
	<description>IT management in a changing IT world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/794#comment-77109</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=794#comment-77109</guid>
		<description>I view Wave as a possible &quot;open, distributed, Twitter-like thing&quot;.  And I&#039;ve long viewed Twitter as &quot;persistent IRC&quot;.   

As for whether it&#039;s RESTful.... well, no, it isn&#039;t, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s bad.   Besides, a Wave can contain hypermedia, can&#039;t it?   So, it doesn&#039;t try to replace the web, contrary to early reaction.   It&#039;s just a supplementary channel to deliver the same media.   Seems more centralized, though, so probably won&#039;t have the same scale, though it&#039;s too early to tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view Wave as a possible &#8220;open, distributed, Twitter-like thing&#8221;.  And I&#8217;ve long viewed Twitter as &#8220;persistent IRC&#8221;.   </p>
<p>As for whether it&#8217;s RESTful&#8230;. well, no, it isn&#8217;t, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s bad.   Besides, a Wave can contain hypermedia, can&#8217;t it?   So, it doesn&#8217;t try to replace the web, contrary to early reaction.   It&#8217;s just a supplementary channel to deliver the same media.   Seems more centralized, though, so probably won&#8217;t have the same scale, though it&#8217;s too early to tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/794#comment-75444</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=794#comment-75444</guid>
		<description>Sorry to make you seasick :) But at least you read our take. We kept the focus on enterprise uses for Wave, which abnormally are more interesting that the consumer ones, at least to an enterprise wonk like me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to make you seasick :) But at least you read our take. We kept the focus on enterprise uses for Wave, which abnormally are more interesting that the consumer ones, at least to an enterprise wonk like me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
