<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State modeling: party over, go home now.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/348/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/348</link>
	<description>IT management in a changing IT world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS Resource Access working group starting at W3C</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/348#comment-54306</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS Resource Access working group starting at W3C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=348#comment-54306</guid>
		<description>[...] The most obvious potential pushback against this effort is the questionable architectural need to redo over SOAP what can be done over simple HTTP. Along the lines of Erik Wilde&#8217;s &#8220;HTTP over SOAP over HTTP&#8221; post. But I don&#8217;t expect too much noise about this aspect, because even on the blogosphere people eventually get tired of repeating the same arguments. If some really wanted to put up a fight against this, it would have been done when the group was first announced, not now. That resource modeling party is over. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The most obvious potential pushback against this effort is the questionable architectural need to redo over SOAP what can be done over simple HTTP. Along the lines of Erik Wilde&#8217;s &#8220;HTTP over SOAP over HTTP&#8221; post. But I don&#8217;t expect too much noise about this aspect, because even on the blogosphere people eventually get tired of repeating the same arguments. If some really wanted to put up a fight against this, it would have been done when the group was first announced, not now. That resource modeling party is over. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savas Parastatidis</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/348#comment-51860</link>
		<dc:creator>Savas Parastatidis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=348#comment-51860</guid>
		<description>:-)

thanks for the comments!

It was indeed a lot of fun but it was time to put it to rest :-))) That was the goal of the article.

.savas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-)</p>
<p>thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>It was indeed a lot of fun but it was time to put it to rest :-))) That was the goal of the article.</p>
<p>.savas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
