Comments on: WS Resource Access at W3C: the good, the bad and the ugly http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/225 William Vambenepe's stage Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:33:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Resource Access Spin at subbu.org http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/225#comment-331 Resource Access Spin at subbu.org Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:19:26 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=225#comment-331 [...] when the WS-* side concluded that uniform interfaces don’t meet the needs? Looks like a resource access [...] [...] when the WS-* side concluded that uniform interfaces don’t meet the needs? Looks like a resource access [...]

]]> By: Umit Yalcinalp http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/225#comment-330 Umit Yalcinalp Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:05:18 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/?p=225#comment-330 +1 on the ugly... The undeterministic semantic for the fine granular put is problematic at best. Further, the assumption for the resource to have XML infoset as its model is most restrictive. Well observed. +1 on the ugly… The undeterministic semantic for the fine granular put is problematic at best. Further, the assumption for the resource to have XML infoset as its model is most restrictive. Well observed.

]]>