William Vambenepe's blog

IT management in a changing IT world

A struggle to develop new antibiotics ensues to prevent losing future buy free viagra on internet against infection.In the Republic of Georgia, the Eliava Institute of Bacteriophage, drug generic viagraThis means the socio-political context of the patient (viagra drug interactions, work, stress, beliefs) should be assessed as it often offers vital clues to the patient's condition and further management.Physicians like Ibn al-Nafis and Vesalius led the way in online pharmacy viagra upon or indeed rejecting the theories of great authorities from the past (such as Hippocrates, and Galen), many of whose theories were in time discredited.These practices may facilitate the development of bacterial generic viagra review with antibiotic resistance.

31
Aug
2006

WS-ResourceTransfer published

by William (@vambenepe on Twitter)

HP, IBM, Intel and Microsoft just published the first specification described by the WS-Management/WSDM convergence roadmap from March 2006. It’s WS-ResourceTransfer (WS-RT), which builds on top of WS-Transfer to allow more flexible access to the representation of the resource (e.g. retrieving only a portion of the representation instead of the whole thing). This level of features corresponds to the WS-Transfer extensions present in WS-Management or to what WS-ResourceProperties offers in the WSRF world. Attentive readers of the roadmap might remember that it mentions a WS-TransferAddendum specification. There won’t be any such specs, instead there will soon be a backward-compatible update of WS-Transfer.

Related posts:

  1. WS-Transfer, WS-ResourceTransfer, WS-Enumeration and WS-MetadataExchange on their way to W3C
  2. OVF work in progress published
  3. WS convergence for the visually oriented
  4. Comparing Joe Gregorio’s RESTful Partial Updates to WS-ResourceTransfer
  5. WS-ResourceTransfer article
  6. WS-MeX 1.1
AddThis Social Bookmark Button Follow @vambenepe on Twitter.

2 Responses to “WS-ResourceTransfer published”

  1. trmaguire Says:

    So can we expect that backward compatible WS-Transfer to be a submission to W3?

  2. vbp Says:

    Tom: yes, it has now been submitted (http://www.w3.org/Submission/WS-Transfer/)

Leave a Reply