http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131 IT management in a changing IT world Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:39:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-33391 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » Microsoft ditches SML, returns to SDM? Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:44:38 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-33391 [...] changes around project Oslo might have further weakened the justification for using SML. In another FUD-spreading blog post, I hypothesized about what Oslo means for SML/CML. This recent development with the CMDB reinforces [...] [...] changes around project Oslo might have further weakened the justification for using SML. In another FUD-spreading blog post, I hypothesized about what Oslo means for SML/CML. This recent development with the CMDB reinforces [...]

]]> http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-30514 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » A sign of life from the CML working group Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:13:14 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-30514 [...] If you are wondering about timelines, you’re out of luck. When referring to CML the white paper mixes present and future tenses, and also throws in some conditionals for good measure. Hard to guess how much is real at this point. And the next steps are? More scenarios and some guidelines. See you in 2009 (which BTW is consistent with my little theory about Oslo’s impact on CML). [...] [...] If you are wondering about timelines, you’re out of luck. When referring to CML the white paper mixes present and future tenses, and also throws in some conditionals for good measure. Hard to guess how much is real at this point. And the next steps are? More scenarios and some guidelines. See you in 2009 (which BTW is consistent with my little theory about Oslo’s impact on CML). [...]

]]>