http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131 William Vambenepe's stage Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:33:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-93 William Vambenepe — Updates on Microsoft Oslo and “SSH on Windows” Fri, 06 Aug 2010 06:40:54 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-93 [...] Oslo” with a sympathetic eye for the almost three years since it’s been introduced. I look at it from the perspective of model-driven IT management but the news hadn’t been [...] [...] Oslo” with a sympathetic eye for the almost three years since it’s been introduced. I look at it from the perspective of model-driven IT management but the news hadn’t been [...]

]]> http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-92 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » Microsoft ditches SML, returns to SDM? Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:44:38 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-92 [...] changes around project Oslo might have further weakened the justification for using SML. In another FUD-spreading blog post, I hypothesized about what Oslo means for SML/CML. This recent development with the CMDB reinforces [...] [...] changes around project Oslo might have further weakened the justification for using SML. In another FUD-spreading blog post, I hypothesized about what Oslo means for SML/CML. This recent development with the CMDB reinforces [...]

]]> http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-91 William Vambenepe’s blog » Blog Archive » A sign of life from the CML working group Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:13:14 +0000 http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/131#comment-91 [...] If you are wondering about timelines, you’re out of luck. When referring to CML the white paper mixes present and future tenses, and also throws in some conditionals for good measure. Hard to guess how much is real at this point. And the next steps are? More scenarios and some guidelines. See you in 2009 (which BTW is consistent with my little theory about Oslo’s impact on CML). [...] [...] If you are wondering about timelines, you’re out of luck. When referring to CML the white paper mixes present and future tenses, and also throws in some conditionals for good measure. Hard to guess how much is real at this point. And the next steps are? More scenarios and some guidelines. See you in 2009 (which BTW is consistent with my little theory about Oslo’s impact on CML). [...]

]]>