<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of the CMDBf specification version 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128</link>
	<description>IT management in a changing IT world</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illustrative algorithm for CMDBf 1.0 Query operation</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128#comment-30214</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illustrative algorithm for CMDBf 1.0 Query operation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128#comment-30214</guid>
		<description>[...] algorithm assumes that the query request does not make use of the xpathExpression element because, as I have explained in my review of CMDBf 1.0, I don&#8217;t think interoperability is achievable on this feature in the current state of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] algorithm assumes that the query request does not make use of the xpathExpression element because, as I have explained in my review of CMDBf 1.0, I don&#8217;t think interoperability is achievable on this feature in the current state of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How not to re-use XML technologies</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128#comment-28158</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How not to re-use XML technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/128#comment-28158</guid>
		<description>[...] have already covered this in my review of CMDBf 1.0. The main problem is that while XML is a fine interchange format for the CMDBf specification, one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have already covered this in my review of CMDBf 1.0. The main problem is that while XML is a fine interchange format for the CMDBf specification, one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
