<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCA is not just for code portability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125</link>
	<description>IT management in a changing IT world</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SCA, OGSi and Spring from an IT management perspective</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125#comment-34364</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SCA, OGSi and Spring from an IT management perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125#comment-34364</guid>
		<description>[...] part, manageability, is of course what interests me the most in this area. I mentioned this before in the context of SCA alone but the conjunction of SCA with Spring and/or OSGi only increases the potential. What happened with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part, manageability, is of course what interests me the most in this area. I mentioned this before in the context of SCA alone but the conjunction of SCA with Spring and/or OSGi only increases the potential. What happened with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Oslo accords (presumably between composite application modeling and systems management)?</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125#comment-23079</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Oslo accords (presumably between composite application modeling and systems management)?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/125#comment-23079</guid>
		<description>[...] it wouldn&#8217;t make sense for Microsoft to support SCA. Through comments in his post as well as a blog post of my own, I followed-up with the assertion that the application component model also plays a very important [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it wouldn&#8217;t make sense for Microsoft to support SCA. Through comments in his post as well as a blog post of my own, I followed-up with the assertion that the application component model also plays a very important [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
