<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: XMLFrag SOAP header</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114</link>
	<description>IT management in a changing IT world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; REST in practice for IT and Cloud management (part 2: configuration management)</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-80932</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; REST in practice for IT and Cloud management (part 2: configuration management)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-80932</guid>
		<description>[...] effect. BTW, I have issues with the details of how these mechanisms work (and I have described an alternative under the motto &#8220;if you are going to suffer with WS-Addressing, at least get some value out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] effect. BTW, I have issues with the details of how these mechanisms work (and I have described an alternative under the motto &#8220;if you are going to suffer with WS-Addressing, at least get some value out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS Resource Access at W3C: the good, the bad and the ugly</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-46744</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS Resource Access at W3C: the good, the bad and the ugly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-46744</guid>
		<description>[...] The resource access part might be worth doing (one more time), but probably not in the same group as things like metadata discovery, message filtering and message chunking, which are not specific to &#8220;resource access&#8221; situations. And if someone is going to do this again, rather than repeating the not too useful approaches of the past, it may be good to consider alternatives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The resource access part might be worth doing (one more time), but probably not in the same group as things like metadata discovery, message filtering and message chunking, which are not specific to &#8220;resource access&#8221; situations. And if someone is going to do this again, rather than repeating the not too useful approaches of the past, it may be good to consider alternatives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS-ManagementHammer: don&#8217;t do it but if you are going to do it anyway then&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-41831</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vambenepe&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; WS-ManagementHammer: don&#8217;t do it but if you are going to do it anyway then&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-41831</guid>
		<description>[...] Call it SOAPy mashup if you want to feel like you are part of the cool kids. I described such a mechanism a while ago. In effect, it is an improvement on wsman:Selector that an eventual new iteration of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Call it SOAPy mashup if you want to feel like you are part of the cool kids. I described such a mechanism a while ago. In effect, it is an improvement on wsman:Selector that an eventual new iteration of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: log.illsley.org</title>
		<link>http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-7175</link>
		<dc:creator>log.illsley.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stage.vambenepe.com/archives/114#comment-7175</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WS-SubversiveAddressing...&lt;/strong&gt;

William Vambenepe published his XMLFrag header proposal earlier this week and it immediately caught my eye. This was in part because of the idea of a &#8216;WS-SubversiveAddressing&#8217; specification (WS-Addressing has been a lot of my day job at IBM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WS-SubversiveAddressing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>William Vambenepe published his XMLFrag header proposal earlier this week and it immediately caught my eye. This was in part because of the idea of a &#8216;WS-SubversiveAddressing&#8217; specification (WS-Addressing has been a lot of my day job at IBM&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
